Algoramming performs technical due diligence and architecture review from Dhaka, Bangladesh for founders, teams, and investors across the UAE, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, the US, the UK, and Australia. We assess a system's architecture, code quality, scalability, and risk, and deliver a clear, evidence-based report you can act on or hand to an investor.
We give you an honest, evidence-based read on a system's architecture and code, whether you are about to scale it, inherit it, or invest in it, with risks named plainly.
SpecialismArchitecture and Technical Due Diligence
Fractional CTOTeam augmentation
DisciplineTech partnership
CadenceTwo-week shipping rhythm
TeamSenior engineers & designers
Source codeYours from commit one
Tech partnership
Discipline
Tech partnership
Cadence
Two-week shipping rhythm
Team
Senior engineers & designers
Source code
Yours from commit one
A deeper look
Everything to know about architecture and due diligence.
What this specialism means in practice, written for the people who buy it and the people who will live inside the product after launch.
Covered end to end4
01
Technical due diligence that stands up to an investor's scrutiny
It is easy to form an opinion about a codebase in an afternoon and be wrong. We assess systematically: architecture and boundaries, code quality and test coverage, how it behaves under load, where the security and single-point-of-failure risks sit, and how maintainable it will be as the team changes. The output is grounded in what we actually found, with examples, so the conclusions hold up whether they are good news or bad.
02
Written for the decision you are making
A due-diligence report is only useful if it maps to a decision. We tailor it to yours, whether you are deciding to scale, to acquire, to invest, or to take over a system someone else built. Risks are ranked by severity and by the effort to fix, so you can tell the difference between a dealbreaker and a Tuesday afternoon, and the remediation plan tells you what to do first if you proceed.
What you get
Outcomes, not deliverables.
We measure success in shipped value, not tickets closed. Every engagement is anchored to a few outcomes both sides can defend.
Two-week shipping rhythm
01
A clear picture of architecture, quality, and risk
02
Scaling and security concerns surfaced before they bite
03
A prioritised remediation plan, if one is needed
04
A report you can hand to a board or an investor
What we deliver
Concrete artifacts, not slide decks.
Everything lands in your repositories, your cloud, and your control. Nothing is locked behind us.
01
Artifact
Architecture and code-quality assessment
02
Artifact
Scalability, security, and reliability findings
03
Artifact
Risk register with severity and effort
04
Artifact
A prioritised remediation roadmap
Our process
The same senior team, the same playbook.
Architecture and due diligence runs on the tech partnership playbook. Boring on purpose, predictable by design.
01Discover
→
02Design
→
03Build
→
04Launch
→
05Support
1
Discover
We audit the team, the code, the cloud bills, and the roadmap, then write down what we found.
Phase 01 / 05
2
Design
We propose a 90-day plan with the unglamorous, high-leverage moves no one had time to make.
Phase 02 / 05
3
Build
We embed in standups, code reviews, and architecture decisions, pushing tempo and quality together.
Phase 03 / 05
4
Launch
We co-own the next big release with your team: process, instrumentation, and incident readiness.
Phase 04 / 05
5
Support
We stay on retainer for the calls that compound: hiring, vendor reviews, and quarterly planning.
Phase 05 / 05
Our toolkit
Pragmatic tools. Senior judgement.
The everyday kit our team reaches for on this work. None of it is sacred; every choice is justified against the problem.
Interface
Application
Data and APIs
Cloud and delivery
01Linear
02Notion
03GitHub
04ClickUp
05Miro
06Slack
07Datadog
08PagerDuty
09AWS Console
10GitHub Actions
Common questions
Things teams ask before signing.
Have a different one? Send a single email; we usually answer within a business day.
Typically one to three weeks depending on the size of the system and the depth you need. Investor timelines can be accommodated when they are tight.
02Do you need full access to the code?
Read access to the code and a few conversations with the team give the most accurate result. We can work with less, and we will be clear about what that limits.
03Will you help fix what you find?
If you want. The report stands on its own, and we can also carry out the remediation, either leading it or supporting your team.
04What does a technical due diligence report include?
An assessment of architecture and code quality, how the system behaves under load, security and single-point-of-failure risks, and how maintainable it is. Findings are backed by examples and ranked by severity and effort, with a prioritised remediation plan so a board or investor can act on it.
05How long does technical due diligence take before a deal?
Typically one to three weeks, depending on the size of the system and the depth you need. When a deal timeline is tight, we can accelerate a focused review that concentrates on the risks most likely to affect the decision.
06What is the difference between an architecture review and due diligence?
An architecture review looks inward, at how a system is built and how to improve it for your own team. Due diligence looks outward, judging the system and its risks for a decision such as investing, acquiring, or scaling. The analysis overlaps; the audience and the framing differ.