Algoramming hardens live applications for performance and security from Dhaka, Bangladesh for teams across the UAE, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, the US, the UK, and Australia. We profile and speed up the parts that hurt, close the security gaps that matter with OWASP-aligned fixes, and leave you with a product measurably faster and harder to attack.
We make a live product measurably faster and meaningfully more secure, by profiling where time and risk actually go and fixing the parts that matter, rather than guessing.
Everything to know about performance and security.
What this specialism means in practice, written for the people who buy it and the people who will live inside the product after launch.
Covered end to end4
01
Measure first, then fix the parts that hurt
Performance work goes wrong when it is guesswork. We profile the real system under real load, find where time and money actually go, the slow query, the oversized payload, the redundant call, and fix those in priority order. Because every change is measured, you see the improvement rather than take it on faith, and you avoid the trap of optimising code that was never the bottleneck.
02
OWASP-aligned security, ranked by exploitability not checklist
A security review that treats every item as equal buries the dangerous issues under trivial ones. We assess against established practice, then rank by how exploitable a gap really is and how much damage it would do. The authentication flaw, the injection risk, the leaking secret, those get fixed first. You end up meaningfully harder to attack, with a clear record of what was closed and what to watch.
What you get
Outcomes, not deliverables.
We measure success in shipped value, not tickets closed. Every engagement is anchored to a few outcomes both sides can defend.
Two-week shipping rhythm
01
Faster pages and responses, proven with before-and-after numbers
02
The most exploitable security gaps closed
03
Lower infrastructure cost from removing waste
04
A clear report of what changed and why it mattered
What we deliver
Concrete artifacts, not slide decks.
Everything lands in your repositories, your cloud, and your control. Nothing is locked behind us.
01
Artifact
Performance profiling and prioritised optimisation
02
Artifact
An OWASP-aligned security review and fixes
03
Artifact
Hardened configuration and dependency updates
04
Artifact
A before-and-after report with measurements
Our process
The same senior team, the same playbook.
Performance and security runs on the maintenance & support playbook. Boring on purpose, predictable by design.
01Discover
→
02Design
→
03Build
→
04Launch
→
05Support
1
Discover
We audit the product, the runbook, and the ticket history, then agree the SLA targets that fit the business.
Phase 01 / 05
2
Design
We design the on-call rotation, the escalation paths, and the monthly maintenance window together.
Phase 02 / 05
3
Build
We add monitoring, alerts, dashboards, and the dependency-update cadence the codebase needs.
Phase 03 / 05
4
Launch
We start picking up tickets slowly, with shadowing, so nothing goes through the cracks.
Phase 04 / 05
5
Support
We run the day-to-day, review SLAs monthly, and ship continuous improvements behind the scenes.
Phase 05 / 05
Our toolkit
Pragmatic tools. Senior judgement.
The everyday kit our team reaches for on this work. None of it is sacred; every choice is justified against the problem.
Interface
Application
Data and APIs
Cloud and delivery
01Datadog
02Sentry
03Grafana
04PagerDuty
05Zendesk
06Intercom
07Linear
08Jira
09Cloudflare
10AWS
Common questions
Things teams ask before signing.
Have a different one? Send a single email; we usually answer within a business day.
It depends on the starting point, but products that were never tuned often see large, obvious gains. We measure before and after so the improvement is a number, not a claim.
02Do you follow the OWASP Top 10 for security hardening?
Yes. The OWASP Top 10 is our baseline for the review, covering risks like injection, broken authentication, and misconfiguration. We do not stop at a checklist, though: we rank findings by how exploitable they really are and how much damage they would do, and fix the dangerous ones first.
03Is hardening a one-off pass or an ongoing service?
Either. A focused hardening pass delivers a lot of value on its own, and it pairs naturally with ongoing maintenance and monitoring to keep the gains as the product and its dependencies change.
04Will hardening risk breaking the live product?
We work behind tests and staged changes, with the ability to roll back, so improvements land safely rather than trading speed for stability.